January 17, 2011

Is knowing worth the risk? Why amnio-caused miscarriages may soon be a thing of the past.

It's funny. There are always questions people ask when they find out a woman is pregnant.  One of them is whether it's a boy or a girl, which is promptly followed by a question about preference.  And inevitably, most women will say that they don't care if it's a boy or a girl, as long as it's healthy.

And while it's cliché, it is also very, very true.

I learned this when I was pregnant with my daughter.  My doctor asked if I wanted to take something called an AFP test.  Basically, it's a blood test that checks to see if there is a possibility that your unborn baby has a birth defect, such as Down syndrome. "Sure," I said without hesitation.  My doctor then began to tell me that many women forgo the test because it has such a high rate of false positives.  But I felt I had nothing to worry about and willingly gave my blood.

Fast forward a week or so later.  I checked my voicemail and my doctor (not the nurse or receptionist) had left me a message asking me to call him back.  And you know what?  I wasn't even worried.  Never once did my mind even go back to the AFP test.

I remember I was sitting on the floor of my living room.  I can still vividly see my husband sitting on the couch as he watched my face go from nonchalance to shock to absolute sadness.  I listened as my doctor told me that my AFP test had come back with a possible risk for Down syndrome. 

Anyone who knows me knows I never shut up.  And in that moment, on the phone with my doctor, I had nothing to say.  I remember tears fell silently from my eyes as I looked at my husband's confused face.  I listened as the doctor explained that this was just a POSSIBILITY...that the test does not mean my child HAS Down syndrome, just a risk for it.

It didn't make me feel any better.  We had to go in and have an ultrasound, where they would look for any markers indicating that my baby had Down syndrome.  Before we went in, we were told that if there were any markers, I could have an amniocentesis, which would give us a definitive answer.  But the amnio carried a risk of miscarriage and I could also end up losing an otherwise healthy baby.

My husband said we should not have the amnio if there were no markers.  Why risk the baby if there didn't appear to be a problem?  So I agreed.  And we had the ultrasound. And there were no markers. (Thank God!)

While we never had an amnio, I would be lying if I said I didn't want it.  For the rest of my pregnancy, there was this cloud hanging over me.  I would forget about the AFP test results and then the worry would come rushing over me. At times, I was consumed by fear. I just couldn't wait to have my baby in my arms so I could see for sure that he/she was alright.

And she was! 

I have a picture that was taken seconds after my daughter was put in my arms.  My eyes are closed and I'm kissing her forehead.  And I remember what was going through my mind.  "Thank you, thank you, thank you."

But soon, risky amnios may be a thing of the past.  A Chinese study found that new technology has been able to detect Down syndrome with a simple blood test.

No more needles through the belly.  No more deaths of otherwise healthy babies. 

Whether the results of the test matter is a personal decision.  I know that for my husband and me, it didn't matter if the child had a birth defect.  Termination was not an option.

But researchers say the blood test could one day be given during the first trimester.  And that may make it easier for a couple to decide whether to continue with the pregnancy.

Looking back, I wish I had listened to my doctor and never taken the AFP test.  Although my daughter is a picture of health, I can still remember the fear that occasionally ate away at my happiness.  So with excitement, I wait for the day when those long needles are put away and the knowledge about a baby's health can be found in a tiny vial of blood.

January 5, 2011

"New" autism news. Are parents listening??

You always want to protect your child...from both the seen and unseen dangers in the world. And when a headline screamed the words "AUTISM LINKED TO VACCINES", parents sat up and took notice.

Now there are headlines stating that the 1998 British study that launched the autism-vaccine link has been retracted. The British Medical Journal stated that the study's author misrepresented or altered the medical information of the twelve (TWELVE??) patients in the study.

How many of you parents are sitting up and noticing now?

It is quite a conundrum, isn't it? You've been trying to be the best parent you can. You've been reading all the magazine articles, listening to the news and following current recalls to make sure your baby isn't sleeping in a drop-side crib or wearing a hoodie with drawstrings.

And when the supposed autism-vaccine link was made, you reacted. Maybe you spaced out your child's vaccines or didn't vaccinate at all. And after putting stock into one idea, how do you flip back to the other side? Or can you? You believed that news story/author/parent back then. Can you really change your mind now??

When my daughter was born, I was very concerned about vaccines. But I had been actually hearing for quite some time that the autism-vaccine link didn't hold any water. And despite knowing this, I still spaced out her shots.

Why? Because it made sense. While I wasn't sure if there the MMR shot would suddenly change my happy-go-lucky kid into an autistic, I did realize that pumping several drugs into her little body wasn't the right thing to do.

So instead she gets one type of shot at a time. That way, if there is a reaction, I know what she is reacting to. And honestly, it eased my mind.

But I know there are those of you who believe there are too many vaccines and that they are given too early. And I can agree to a point. For instance, why do ALL infants have to be given a Hepatitis B shot, when it seems unlikely that they would come in contact with the blood or semen of an infected person? It seems to me someone (read: Merck) is making a whole lot of money off all these shots. And that makes me nervous about whose best interests are being protected.

So after hearing this "new" news, how many of you are willing to change your mind about vaccines? What would it take to make you believe that vaccines DO NOT cause autism? And if you are holding steadfast to the link, why? I'm sure many parents (like me) would love to hear both sides.

Until next time....